Claims that Canadians are taking out risky variable-rate mortgages and borrowing more than they can afford “are not based on actual data” and “are misinformed.” That’s according to CAAMP, who issued this study of 40,000 mortgages from 2009: Revisiting The Canadian Mortgage Market…
Despite rising home prices, first-time mortgagors took out “far less” than they could afford last year, says CAAMP.
"The vast majority of Canadian mortgage borrowers are not taking on undue risks. They have factored rising interest rates in to their mortgage decisions," stated Jim Murphy, president and CEO of CAAMP.
CAAMP ran simulations to estimate what would happen if the Bank of Canada hiked rates 3% over two years (and fixed rates rose 1.25%).
It found that income gains should offset much or all of the increases in mortgage payments that most Canadian’s would experience.
"The bottom line from the simulations is that even though mortgage payments will probably rise for most borrowers, the increase in their incomes will more than offset the higher payments," said CAAMP chief economist Will Dunning. “All in all, the degree of risk from rising mortgage rates appears to be small and manageable,” he writes.
A key finding in the report was that 86% of Canadian home buyers took out fixed rates in 2009. Here’s a breakdown of the terms they selected:
- 5% chose 1- to 2-year terms
- 20% chose 3-year terms
- 5% chose 4-year terms
- 70% chose 5- to 10-year terms
Other notable findings from the study:
- 5%: Number of Canadian households who purchase a home each year.
- 50-60%: Number of those who are first-time homebuyers.
- 0.03%: Percentage of first-time home buyers (compared to all home owners) that are “pushing the envelope” by getting mortgages they may not be able to afford.
CAAMP estimates these “at-risk” borrowers amount to 4,000 households out of 13,250,000 in Canada.
- 10%: Annual growth rate of mortgage debt in the last five years.
”This growth rate was far in excess of growth of incomes and therefore mortgage debt has become a growing burden for Canadian households,” CAAMP said.
CAAMP attributed this growth to rising home prices and increased home ownership. 70% of households now own homes, versus 63.6% in 1996.
- 5.425 million: Number of Canadian mortgage holders.
- 22.3%: Average GDS ratio of a home buyer in 2009
32% is the traditional GDS maximum. This stat is a pleasant surprise. According to CAAMP’s findings, most Canadians appear to be underbuying, not overbuying--as some critics charge.
- 32.8%: Average TDS ratio of a home buyer in 2009
Similar to GDS above, this is well below the standard. 40-42% is the typical TDS maximum.
- 0.44%: Current percentage of mortgage holders in arrears.
CAAMP says arrears averaged 0.50% in the 1990s. Mortgage arrears are highly correlated with Canada’s employment rate. Reduced hours/pay and separations/divorce are secondary factors. CAAMP says it “appear(s) most likely that the arrears rate is close to peaking.”
Dunning closed the report by writing: “Virtually every Canadian who is in a position to buy a home and qualify for a mortgage is well-educated and capable of assessing what is in their best interests, of looking forward, and of anticipating threats to their financial well-being.”
Let’s keep it that way by advising homeowners to remain conservative.
_______________________________________________________
Sidebar: More details on the study above:
- Data was collected from a CAAMP survey of its corporate members
- Sample size was 40,000 mortgages totalling $10 billion
- This represents about one-sixth of total mortgage activity for home purchases in Canada.
- The mortgages were all funded in 2009
- The data included purchases only. No renewals or refinances.
- The vast majority of mortgages in the dataset are high-ratio and insured.
Hybrid Mortgages Catching On
94% of people still choose either fixed or variable rates, says CAAMP. Very few choose a combination of both.
That may be changing, if yesterday’s RBC/Ipsos Reid poll is right.
According to RBC, 40% of prospective homebuyers (people who plan to buy in the next two years) intend to take out a hybrid mortgage. That compares to 32% in last year’s survey.
These stats are a little hard to grasp given CAAMP’s recent mortgage survey. It suggests only 6% of Canadians have actually chosen a hybrid mortgage in the last year. However, Ipsos Reid’s Sean Simpson, says: “I would account for the difference by saying that one is an outlook while the other is retrospective.”
Simpson notes that, “Looking forward to the next two years, there is much more uncertainty in the direction of interest rates.” He says that Hybrids are, therefore, becoming more attractive since they let people capitalize on low rates while retaining an element of security.
Based on what an RBC spokesperson told us, hybrids may be catching on fast. In terms of the number of new buyers choosing hybrids, RBC says: "We have been trending similar to the survey results over the last quarter."
Marcia Moffat, head of Home Equity Financing at RBC, adds: "As consumers begin to learn about the benefits of mortgage diversification, we're seeing more homebuyers gain a better comfort level with adding floating rate mortgage options."
From our own anecdotal observations, that appears to be the case. We’re not seeing anywhere close to 32-40% of borrowers choose hybrids, but there’s been a noticeable increase in hybrid mortgage inquiries compared to last year.
The academic research supports hybrids as well. Dr. Moshe Milevsky--Canada’s most quoted mortgage researcher—says: “Nobody can truly predict how rates will move over a five-year period. It’s just that simple.”
He, therefore, believes hybrids are a good form of mortgage risk management. “People should strongly consider mortgages that are part fixed and part floating,” he told us last year. Interest rate diversification benefits borrowers just like it benefits investors who buy portfolios of stocks.
Of course, if history is a guide, well-qualified borrowers may save more money by simply choosing an ultra-low variable rate, or a 1-year fixed. But not all borrowers are in the same boat. Homeowners with only moderately strong personal “balance sheets,” can’t afford to dismiss the concept of risk management.
Many moderately-strong borrowers will, in fact, assume the risk of putting 100% of their mortgage in a variable rate. These folks will probably never realize the value of rate diversification/risk management unless the “worst case” materializes…and then it’s usually too late.
______________________________________________________
Sidebar: Here’s a partial list of lenders who currently offer hybrid mortgages:
If we forgot any major ones, let us know and we’ll add them to the list.
This list does not include all lenders that offer readvanceable mortgages. Readvanceable mortgages often include a fixed portion and line of credit (LOC) portion. That technically makes them a form of hybrid mortgage as well, assuming that part of the mortgage is put in the LOC.
Posted at 10:57 AM in Mortgage Commentary, Mortgage Industry Reports | Permalink | Comments (16)