Vukanovich says concerns about extended amortizations “are misplaced.” Long amortizations “should not be confused with subprime mortgages,” he says. “Unlike subprime loans, extended amortization products are intended for ‘prime’ borrowers with a good credit history.”
Vukanovich cites three examples of borrowers that are well suited to 40-year ams.:
Early-career borrowers with higher income earning potential
Those who anticipate other significant short-term expenses
People trying to buy into higher priced urban markets
Add income property investors to the list as well.
Granted, the stated interest on 40-year amortizations is huge versus the 25-year variety. But it’s the effective amortization that’s most important suggests Vokanovich. He notes that most Canadians pre-pay their mortgage well ahead of time. (Although probably not the ones destined to default – Ed.)
Doing something as simple as moving from monthly to accelerated bi-weekly payments cuts a 40-year amortization down to 32 years. Applying lump sums (like tax refunds) can save tens of thousands of dollars more.
In the end, 40-year ams. probably won’t spark mass defaults or the implosion of Canada’s real estate market. The “correction” will likely be economy driven. So until there is evidence to the contrary, 40-year mortgages will keep being promoted by lenders and keep being eaten up by the public.
Like news like this?
Join our CMT Updates list and get the latest news as it happens. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you for subscribing. One more step: Please confirm your subscription via the email sent to you.