Mortgage defaults have been in the press a bit more as of late. In the link that follows, lawyer and Realtor, Brian Madigan, offers up suggestions for “Putting the Brakes on a Power of Sale.”
In many cases, it’s because subprime capital sources have dried up and lenders don’t have money to lend, even if they wanted to. It’s no fault of the mortgage company. Most would love to be able to lend again in the high-margin subprime market–if they could.
Examples of lenders who are currently not offering subprime renewals (at all, or to some extent) include: Accredited, First National Excalibur, HSBC Finance, GE Money, Resmor, and Xceed. Some of these lenders are out of the Canadian market completely.
Only a small number of Canadians are affected by all this, but for those who are, it’s a scary position to be in. If this is your situation, and you are facing foreclosure because your lender won’t renew you, there may still be some limited options. For another subprime or private lender to rescue you, however, it’s got to be a solid deal for them. Among other things (and depending on the lender):
- The property must be decent and in a good location
- You need to have shown the ability and willingness to pay your bills for a period of time
- You need adequate employment
- You need enough equity
- etc…
For the best advice, consult with a mortgage planner who specializes in subprime financing (many don’t).
I must say, I feel for those who work hard for their homes and no matter want, the banks will still take away their homes. I thing banks should look for a win/win solution that will keep the families in their homes either by deferring or reducing payments for a period of time until this recession passes.
I would agree with you Darryl. There are now examples (in the U.S) where even the banks are walking away. What benefit is there in that. All that ends up happening is neighborhoods become boarded up, looters come in and destroy the homes and voila…you have a completely worthless asset.
Why don’t these banks recognize that they would be better off working with the homeowners and negotiating something that works for both. I think it would be better for the banks to take 40-50% loss and have a community stay viable, thereby saving other homeowners and the bank from more losses than to just let the whole community sink.
Paul, please don’t spam the site, I am sure the bank made many attempts to accomodate your issues.
You have the ombudsman’s information go through the appropriate measures to get your justice–ombudsman, court, etc., but spamming a web site is not going to make me change or close my account with anyone.
The post in question was deleted as this is not the appropriate forum for it. -CMT