Genworth has responded to the Globe & Mail's somewhat fallacious story on "high risk" mortgages.
Brian Hurley, President of international development at Genworth, said this in a statement published by the Globe Tuesday:
It was the easing of traditional underwriting standards in the U.S. – not extended amortizations – that put so many subprime borrowers in loans they could not afford. Here in Canada, the overwhelming majority of 40-year mortgages are prime loans held by customers with solid credit – and who would have qualified for mortgages with 25-year amortizations. Arrears here are near all-time lows.
Genworth supported Ottawa's decision to limit its government guarantee to mortgages with a maximum 35-year amortization. Healthy competition between CMHC and Genworth has provided an important second set of eyes that act as a check against unwise lending.
On a related note, we heard an interesting stat from one insurer yesterday. Only 3 out of every 100 borrowers with a 40-year amortization would not have qualified at a 25-year amortization. It therefore appears clear that Canadians were using 40-year mortgages as an option and not out of necessity. (Contrary to the anecdotal cases we've seen.)
Press ESC to close
Get The Latest News
Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates as they happen. Unsubscribe any time.