Click here to join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates as they happen. Unsubscribe any time.

Reverse Mortgage Competition is Here

Despite a decade of double-digit growth, HomeEquity Bank has zero meaningful competition.

Remember these guys (Seniors Money)? They lasted only a year.

But times are about to change. This morning a new horseman rode into town: Equitable Bank.

The country’s #1 alternative lender has announced the “PATH Home Plan.” PATH is basically a reverse mortgage with the same reverse mortgage rates as CHIP, the leading product in the space from HomeEquity Bank.

But there are key differences with CHIP/HomeEquity:

  • Equitable charges $995 for setup. HomeEquity charges $1,795 but unlike Equitable, its fee includes legal/closing costs making them roughly equivalent)
  • Equitable’s LTV is capped at 40% versus HomeEquity’s 55% (A big edge for HomeEquity, especially among the 75+ year-olds who qualify for loan-to-values over 40%)
  • PATH is available only in Alberta, BC and Ontario while CHIP is national (At this time, no other provinces are planned, says Equitable VP of Residential Sales, Kim Kukulowicz.)
  • Equitable’s maximum reverse mortgage amount is $400,000 versus well over $1 million for HomeEquity
  • Equitable’s minimum house value requirement is $250,000
  • Equitable pays brokers one point on funds advanced, but HomeEquity offers even higher compensation for brokers who refer a lot of deals (talk to your BDM for details)
  • Equitable sells regular mortgages too, and counts reverse mortgage volume towards its brokers’ status.
Equitable VP of Residential Sales, Kim Kukulowicz

“We’ve been working on this for the last couple of years,” says Kukulowicz, who sees no need to battle CHIP on rates. “We purposely don’t want to undercut them…It doesn’t really make sense for us.”

Equitable is confident it can instead leverage its existing broker relationships to drive volume and eat into HomeEquity’s pie. And that pie is growing. Canada’s reverse mortgage market is far bigger than the annual originations we see today.

“…Based on our research and looking at the U.S., U.K. and Australia, we believe [there could be a] 2% penetration rate for seniors aged 60-plus,” says Kukulowicz. “That would make the addressable market approximately $12 billion a year.”

In terms of staying power, Equitable is no Seniors Money (the now defunct reverse mortgage vendor that ran out of funding in Canada). Equitable funds its PATH product through a stable stream of deposit. Barring the improbable, it won’t be in this business for the short term.

The question is, how much of HomeEquity’s lunch will Equitable eat?

PATH’s lower fees are a material edge for cost-conscious seniors, but HomeEquity can match those fees if needed. HomeEquity also has a real edge in loan-to-value, brand recognition among seniors and compensation for high-volume brokers.

So it’s not going to be easy for Equitable.

But that matters less than one might think as Equitable will undoubtedly tweak its offering over time. Moreover, competition ultimately creates benefits for consumers. And reverse mortgage competition is now here….at long last.